Where the review comes alive
The simulator lets you test the picture before you decide
Change the weights and watch the ranking shift right there in the room. That shows how robust a position is, where the disagreement sits, and that every choice can be traced afterwards.
Sensitivity becomes visible
Some initiatives stay high no matter the weighting. Others only thanks to a single criterion. The difference decides how far you dare lean on the position.
Disagreement becomes manageable
Disagreement in a leadership team is nearly always about weights, not facts. Run both views and see the difference. Concrete, not a clash of opinions.
The decision can be defended
Every saved calibration becomes a timestamped version. The chain behind the number is still there when someone asks why.
What remains
The review is the starting point. In the platform the work continues, as a living picture you can return to.
- The perspective selector. Toggle views on and off and save the one that fits the conversation.
- The goal map. See which goals are well-supported, thin or starving.
- The dependency map. What hangs on what, as relationships and not scores.
- The decision history. Timestamped decision points, so you can put then against now.
Want to dig into the mathematics?
A complete documentation of the method behind Priopti, the formulas, the weights and the normalization, academic references and known limitations. For technical evaluators and IT architects.
